The math wars of the 1990′s have quieted down and are almost a thing of the past.
With the release of their 2006 guidelines, the National Council for Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) effectively ended 17 years of promoting ‘reform math’ programs and acknowledged the need for schools to return to more traditional math programs.
Teachers and Homeschool parents can now move on to the next question. Which traditional math curriculum is best? The correct answer depends largely on the needs and preferences of each teacher and student.
There are many traditional math programs to choose from. This provides a brief review of two of the most popular programs, Singapore Math and Saxon Math. These two curriculums have some things in common:
• Both are used in public schools, private schools and homeschools
• Both have clear track records of improving standardized test scores
• Both share the traditional math emphasis on math facts as the building blocks of all math concepts
• Both have proven to be effective with a wide range of students
They also have some important differences:
Cost Comparison – Saxon Math books are more expensive than Singapore Math books because Saxon has a lot more pages. Saxon student books are hard cover from 8th grade and up.
Saxon Emphasizes Practice – Saxon Math puts more emphasis on doing practice exercises while Singapore Math puts more emphasis on critically thinking through concepts. After concepts are introduced, Saxon moves immediately into practice exercises to help cement the concept in the student’s mind. Saxon requires students to memorize formulas, achieve fluent recall of math facts and apply algorithms to solve problems.
Singapore Emphasizes Thinking – Singapore teachers spend more time helping students to think through and verbally discuss each component of the concept. Singapore Math avoids reliance on memorized formulas and algorithms so there is not as much emphasis on repetitive practice exercises. Instead, Singapore strives to give students an understanding of math concepts by walking students through each component of a problem, and then presenting them with the whole problem to solve. This way, students are trained to think actively as they work through each step of a problem instead of plugging the problem into a formula.
Saxon is More Structured – Saxon Math is more structured, making it easier for teachers and students to follow the roadmap. Each new concept is followed by practice exercises. Review questions are provided after every 10 lessons.
Singapore Requires More Teaching – Singapore Math is less structured, using an approach which is less familiar to anyone who learned math in the U.S. As a result, Singapore Math can be more challenging for U.S. teachers and students, especially older students who are already familiar with U.S. math programs. Singapore’s approach puts more burden on teachers to:
• spend more time teaching new concepts, breaking the concepts into components to ensure students are understanding
• stimulate verbal discussion of the concepts
• supplement the material as needed with flash cards, manipulative items, and extra drills
• continually assess how well students are grasping concepts then provide additional assistance as needed
Singapore is More Focused – Saxon Math practice exercises blend previously covered concepts together with new concepts, forcing students to continually review previous concepts. The rationale is repetitive practice over time is necessary to grasp the concepts and to achieve quick and effortless recall of math facts. Singapore focuses on one concept at a time, seeking mastery of each concept before moving on to the next one. One of the reasons why the NCTM liked the Singapore math curriculum is because it focuses only on a few key concepts for each school year. The NCTM recognized a key weakness with some U.S. programs is having too many objectives, making them incoherent and difficult for students to master anything.
Recommendations – For school teachers who are willing to try something new and put more effort into teaching, my recommendation is Singapore Math. Singapore students lead the world in math test scores and your students can do the same. For Homeschool parents who are pressed for time and need a program that allows students to work more independently, my recommendation is Saxon Math. Saxon also offers CD ROM teaching videos to enable students to work even more independently. Saxon is also a great choice for U.S. school teachers looking for a program with a more familiar approach. Saxon Math has proven success with a wide range of students, even turning struggling math students into math lovers!
No tags for this post.







Sadly, teachers and principals have taken no note of the changes in recommendations. None. At least not where I live in the Pacific Northwest. There is a dogmatic adherence to New New Math – these teachers and principals bought the arguments for curricula like TERC and Everyday Math and will not let go. Any disagreement is considered foolishness. Teachers who disagree are told that student failure is due to their lack of buy-in. Consulting firms are hired to get everybody on protocol. No joke.
[Reply]
Learning Things Reply:
April 6th, 2010 at 2:20 am
That is very interesting. Are they aware the NCTM no longer recommends new math? Are they aware of higher test scores from students using more traditional math like Saxon or Singapore? If they are aware, then one has to wonder why they are so dogmatic in supporting new math. Are they truly interested in what is best for the students or do they have some other objective in mind?
[Reply]
Kim Reply:
April 5th, 2011 at 12:19 pm
Yes they are aware. My county in the pacific northwest
is at the bottom of the state in scores, but stubbornly
continue to teach Everyday Math. The Special Education
department is full to bursting and they (secretly) strongly encourage the parents to supplement with Singapore or Saxon.
And I’m not even going to start in on the politics of why.
[Reply]